Back to Blog
GuideFeb 22, 202610 min read

MCP vs REST API — What's Different? Complete Developer Comparison (2026)

NT

Nikhil Tiwari

MCP Playground

📖 TL;DR

  • REST APIs are designed for traditional software clients — stateless, resource-oriented, HTTP verbs
  • MCP is designed for AI agents — stateful sessions, tool-oriented, JSON-RPC over HTTP or STDIO
  • MCP doesn't replace REST — it typically wraps your REST API to make it AI-friendly
  • Use REST for web/mobile apps; use MCP when the client is an LLM like Claude

The Key Difference in One Sentence

REST APIs are designed for traditional software clients. MCP is designed for AI agents.

REST assumes the client is a developer-written program that knows exactly which endpoint to call and what parameters to pass. MCP assumes the client is an LLM — one that needs to discover what capabilities are available, reason about which to use, and maintain context across multiple steps of a task.

Side-by-Side Comparison

REST API MCP Server
Designed for Traditional software clients AI agents (LLMs like Claude)
Protocol HTTP (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) JSON-RPC 2.0 over HTTP/SSE or STDIO
Session model Stateless — each request is independent Stateful — sessions persist across calls
Capability discovery OpenAPI spec / docs (read by humans) Built-in — LLM calls tools/list to discover at runtime
Primitives Endpoints (URLs + HTTP verbs) Tools, Resources, Prompts
Parameters Query strings, path params, request body JSON Schema-defined tool inputs
Auth API keys, OAuth, JWT OAuth 2.1 (built into the MCP spec)
Output format JSON, XML, HTML Content array (text, image, resource)
Error handling HTTP status codes (404, 500, etc.) JSON-RPC error objects with codes
Best for Web apps, mobile apps, microservices AI agents, Claude, Cursor, Copilot

Protocol & Transport

REST communicates using standard HTTP verbs:

# REST — you call a specific URL with an HTTP verb
GET  /users/123           → fetch user
POST /users               → create user
PUT  /users/123           → update user
DELETE /users/123         → delete user

MCP communicates using JSON-RPC 2.0 — a method-call pattern sent over HTTP (streaming) or STDIO:

// MCP — you call methods on a connection
→ { "method": "tools/list" }                     // discover available tools
→ { "method": "tools/call", "params": {          // call a specific tool
     "name": "get_user",
     "arguments": { "id": "123" }
   }}
→ { "method": "resources/list" }                 // list readable resources

The critical difference: the LLM discovers what tools are available at runtime by calling tools/list. With REST, the client developer reads the OpenAPI docs and hardcodes the calls. MCP is self-describing for AI.

Stateful vs Stateless

REST is stateless — every request carries all the context it needs. The server doesn't remember previous requests:

# Each REST call is independent
GET /orders?user_id=123&status=pending   # must re-send user context every time

MCP is stateful — the session maintains context across multiple tool calls. When Claude is working on a multi-step task (e.g., "find all open PRs, summarize them, then close the stale ones"), MCP tracks the session state so each step can build on the last:

// MCP session — context is preserved
Session established → Claude calls list_pull_requests
                   → Claude calls summarize_pr for each
                   → Claude calls close_pr for stale ones
                   // No need to re-authenticate or re-send context each time

Tools, Resources & Prompts vs Endpoints

REST has one primitive: endpoints. MCP has three distinct primitives, each optimized for different AI interaction patterns:

MCP Primitive REST Equivalent When AI Uses It
Tools POST/PUT/DELETE endpoints (write/action) Claude wants to do something (create, update, send)
Resources GET endpoints (read) Claude wants to read data (files, records, pages)
Prompts No direct equivalent Server provides pre-built prompt templates for common tasks

Tools are described with full JSON Schema, so the LLM knows exactly what inputs are required, their types, and what the output will look like — before it even makes the call.

When to Use REST vs MCP

Use REST when:

  • The client is a web app, mobile app, or service
  • You need broad compatibility (browsers, Postman, etc.)
  • Operations are simple and discrete
  • You want standard HTTP caching
  • Your team already knows REST

Use MCP when:

  • The client is an LLM (Claude, Cursor, Copilot)
  • The AI needs to discover capabilities at runtime
  • Tasks require multiple sequential steps
  • You want the AI to maintain context across calls
  • You're building AI agents or agentic workflows

MCP Wraps REST — They're Complementary

MCP doesn't replace your REST API. In practice, MCP servers are thin wrappers around existing REST APIs that make them AI-friendly. Your REST API handles the actual business logic; MCP provides the AI-native discovery and session layer on top.

// Your existing REST API (unchanged)
app.post('/api/create-issue', authenticate, async (req, res) => {
  const issue = await db.issues.create(req.body);
  res.json(issue);
});

// MCP wrapper — calls your REST API under the hood
server.tool("create_issue", {
  title: z.string(),
  description: z.string(),
  priority: z.enum(["low", "medium", "high"])
}, async ({ title, description, priority }) => {
  const response = await fetch('https://yourapp.com/api/create-issue', {
    method: 'POST',
    headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${process.env.API_KEY}` },
    body: JSON.stringify({ title, description, priority })
  });
  const issue = await response.json();
  return { content: [{ type: "text", text: `Created issue #${issue.id}: ${title}` }] };
});

This is exactly how all the major MCP servers work — GitHub MCP wraps the GitHub REST API, Supabase MCP wraps the Supabase REST/PostgREST API, Stripe MCP wraps the Stripe REST API. MCP is the AI translation layer, not a replacement.

Quick rule of thumb: If a human developer is the client, build REST. If an AI model is the client, build MCP (that wraps your REST).

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use my REST API directly with Claude without MCP?+
Yes — Claude supports function calling where you can describe REST API endpoints as tools manually. But MCP is better for production: it standardizes the discovery, handles auth (OAuth 2.1), and works natively in Claude Desktop, Cursor, and other clients without custom integration code.
Is MCP faster or slower than REST?+
For individual calls, MCP has slightly more overhead due to the JSON-RPC envelope and session handshake. But for multi-step agent tasks, MCP is faster overall because the session persists — no repeated auth handshakes or context re-sending between calls.
Does MCP support streaming responses?+
Yes. MCP's HTTP transport uses Server-Sent Events (SSE) for streaming, so long-running tool calls can stream partial results back to the client in real time — similar to how Claude streams text responses.
What's the difference between MCP and GraphQL?+
GraphQL is a query language for APIs — still designed for human-written client code. MCP is a protocol designed for AI agents. GraphQL gives you flexible data fetching; MCP gives LLMs self-describing, discoverable tools with session management built in. They solve different problems.
How do I convert my existing REST API to an MCP server?+
Map your REST endpoints to MCP primitives: GET endpoints → Resources, POST/PUT/DELETE endpoints → Tools. Then use the MCP SDK (TypeScript or Python) to wrap each endpoint. See our Node.js MCP server guide or Python FastMCP tutorial to get started.

Test MCP servers directly in your browser — no install needed

Related Guides

NT

Written by Nikhil Tiwari

15+ years in product development. AI enthusiast building developer tools that make complex technologies accessible to everyone.